WHY AI SOUNDS INTELLIGENT BUT ISN'T: EXPLAINED FOR OLDER ADULTS

Introduction

You've probably had a conversation with ChatGPT or Claude and thought, just for a moment, that it understood you - it answered your question, seemed to follow your reasoning, even adjusted its tone when you pushed back. It didn't understand a word of it.

This isn't a criticism of AI; it's just a fact about how it works, and once you understand why AI sounds intelligent without actually being intelligent, a lot of the confusion around it disappears. (Which is the whole point of this site, after all!)

What it actually is

AI (the kind behind ChatGPT, Claude, and similar tools anyway) is a language model that's been trained on billions of sentences from books, websites, and other text, learning patterns about which words tend to follow other words, which phrases appear together, and what kind of sentence usually comes next in a conversation.

It doesn't come pre-loaded with knowledge or programmed with facts - it learns patterns, not facts, and that distinction matters more than you might think.

How the training works

No, nobody's sitting there reading books to the AI! The training process is more mechanical than that, with text being converted into numbers so every word and punctuation mark becomes a code the computer can work with.

The AI is then shown millions of examples where it has to guess what comes next - it sees "The cat sat on the..." and has to predict "mat" (or "floor", or "chair"). At first it's terrible at this and guesses randomly, but each time it guesses it gets feedback about whether it was right or wrong and adjusts its internal connections to make better predictions next time.

Do this billions of times with billions of examples, and eventually the AI gets very good at predicting what word should come next in almost any context. That's all the training is: guess the next word, check if you're right, adjust, repeat. The AI never "understands" what it's reading; it's just building up a massive statistical model of which words tend to follow which other words in which contexts.

When you ask it something

When you type a question, the AI doesn't think about it or consider what you mean - it just predicts what words are most likely to come next based on everything it's seen before, then predicts the word after that, and keeps going one word at a time until it's generated a full response. It's autocomplete on an unimaginable scale, if you like.

And because it's been trained on so much human writing, it's learned to mimic the patterns of intelligent conversation - it knows that after someone asks a question you give an answer, that explanations should have examples, and what a polite tone sounds like versus a technical one.

But none of that is understanding. It's prediction.

Why it has no memory

Here's something people find hard to grasp: AI doesn't remember anything in the way you do. When you have a conversation with it, the AI isn't thinking "Oh, this person asked me about X earlier, so I should keep that in mind" - it's just predicting what comes next based on the entire conversation so far, including what it already said.

If it seems to remember context, that's because it's re-reading the whole conversation every time it generates a new response. This is why AI sometimes contradicts itself, forgets things you told it, or gives you a different answer if you ask the same question again - it's not being inconsistent, it's just predicting, and predictions vary depending on tiny differences in phrasing or context.

Why it makes things up

AI is designed to always generate a response, even when the correct response would be "I don't know." If the training data doesn't contain the answer, the AI just predicts what an answer would probably look like, and that prediction might be completely wrong.

This is called hallucination, and it's not a bug - it's how the system works. The AI will never tell you "I don't know" because that would mean stopping the prediction process, and it's not built to do that. It will always give you an answer, which is what makes it useful but also what makes it dangerous.

Why it's so convincing

The reason AI sounds intelligent is that intelligence and the appearance of intelligence look the same from the outside - if someone gives you a coherent answer to your question, you assume they understood it. That's reasonable when you're talking to a human but it's the wrong assumption when you're talking to AI.

Here's an analogy: imagine someone who's memorised thousands of chess games but doesn't understand strategy. They can tell you what moves were played in famous matches and can even suggest moves that "look like" what a grandmaster would do because they've seen similar positions before, but they don't know why those moves work.

That's AI - it's seen so many examples of good answers that it can produce something that looks like a good answer, but it doesn't know what it's saying, doesn't know if it's true, doesn't even know what "true" means.

What intelligence actually is

Intelligence (the human kind) involves understanding - it means grasping what something means rather than just what words go together, knowing when you don't know something, and being able to reason through implications (if X is true, and Y is true, then Z must be true).

AI can't do any of that because it doesn't model the world or think through implications; it doesn't have beliefs or knowledge in any meaningful sense. It has statistics - very, very good statistics - and when you ask it a question, it's not retrieving a fact it knows but rather generating text that has a high probability of being the kind of thing that would answer that question. Sometimes that text happens to be true, sometimes it's completely made up, and the AI can't tell the difference.

Why this matters

Understanding that AI isn't intelligent doesn't make it useless, because autocomplete isn't useless either - it's just limited. You wouldn't trust autocomplete to write a legal contract or diagnose a medical condition, and you shouldn't trust AI to do those things either, at least not without serious oversight.

But if you need a first draft of an email, or a summary of a long document, or an explanation of a concept you're unfamiliar with, AI is brilliant because it's fast, it's cheap, and it's often good enough. You just have to remember that it's a tool, not an oracle.

Once you understand that AI is predicting rather than thinking, everything else makes sense: why it sounds so confident even when it's wrong (confidence is a pattern in language, and AI has learned that pattern), why it's brilliant at some tasks and useless at others (prediction works well for tasks that follow clear patterns but fails for tasks requiring actual reasoning), and why you can't fully trust it (because it's guessing what a good answer looks like, not verifying that the answer is correct).

Browse all topics → Index